http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.6/en/news-5-6-6.htmlFunctionality Added or ChangedPerformance: InnoDB: The MySQL server now includes the widely used memcached in-memory caching system, and a plugin that allows fast NoSQL-style access to InnoDB tables through the memcached protocol. This access method avoids the overhead of SQL parsing and constructing a query optimization plan. You can store the underlying data in a single InnoDB table, or spread it across multiple tables. You can read and write data through both memcached and SQL. For example, you can do fast single-key lookups through memcached get calls, and do statistical reports across all the data through SQL.Several configuration options let you fine-tune this system, in particular to balance raw performance against durability and consistency of data. The main new configuration options are daemon_memcached_option, daemon_memcached_r_batch_size, daemon_memcached_w_batch_size, innodb_api_trx_level, innodb_api_enable_mdl, and innodb_api_enable_binlog.See Section 14.2.10, “InnoDB Integration with memcached” for full details.
方便操作总是好的,别让安全问题加剧,希望能有套好的机制,数据库在发展,Added or Changed,看来是谁用谁知道啦
应该说这不是一个什么好消息! 应该说,引入先进的技术了改进自身的性能,是正确的做法 但 mysql 的开发者们似乎是把 memcached 和 No SQL 作为 mysql 的新卖点。这应该是不可取的的 关系型数据库一定会在短期内消亡吗?或许由于语言的问题,我不能正确理解 mysql 开发者们的描述。 其实 memcached 与 mysql 的内存表并没有本质上的区别
应该说,引入先进的技术了改进自身的性能,是正确的做法
但 mysql 的开发者们似乎是把 memcached 和 No SQL 作为 mysql 的新卖点。这应该是不可取的的
关系型数据库一定会在短期内消亡吗?或许由于语言的问题,我不能正确理解 mysql 开发者们的描述。
其实 memcached 与 mysql 的内存表并没有本质上的区别
然后突然就红了,红得一发不可收拾...jquery 又帮它渡了一层金身。